Apr 28, 2026
Move beyond awareness — a practical guide for HR leaders ahead of MHAW 2026.

The scale of workplace mental health problems in the UK is no longer surprising. According to the Health and Safety Executive's latest figures, 964,000 workers experienced work-related stress, depression or anxiety in 2024/25 — a 24 per cent increase year-on-year. Mental ill health is now the single leading cause of long-term sickness absence, accounting for 41 per cent of cases, and the second most common driver of short-term absence, according to CIPD's Health and Wellbeing at Work 2025 report, which surveyed more than 1,100 HR decision-makers.
What is less discussed — and more useful for HR leaders — is the gap between what employers are doing and what is actually reaching employees. That gap is where most of the money is being wasted, and where most of the opportunity lies.
Mental Health Awareness Week 2026 runs from 11 to 17 May, with the theme of Action. It is a well-chosen word. For HR directors and people leaders who have spent years raising awareness, posting Samaritans numbers on intranets, and funding EAP subscriptions, the question that should sit uncomfortably is whether any of it is working.
Deloitte's Mental Health and Employers report, published in 2024, put the annual cost of poor mental health to UK employers at £51 billion. Presenteeism — employees working while mentally unwell — accounts for £24 billion of that figure. Deloitte's analysis also found that for every £1 invested in mental health support, employers receive an average return of £4.70 in increased productivity. For more targeted interventions such as mental health screening and personal therapy, that return rises to £6.30 per £1 spent.
These are not soft estimates. They are drawn from a YouGov survey of more than 3,000 UK working adults and years of employer cost modelling. And yet 63 per cent of employees show at least one characteristic of burnout — up from 51 per cent in 2021 — while 60 per cent identify the cost of living as a primary concern. The financial stress that has compounded since 2022 has deepened the mental health challenge at exactly the moment when NHS waiting lists reached 7.25 million cases with a median wait of nearly 14 weeks.
If your benefits package does not include meaningful, accessible mental health support in 2026, you are not simply missing a best practice benchmark — you are leaving a substantial commercial risk unaddressed.
The most common mental health benefit in UK workplaces is the Employee Assistance Programme. According to HCML research published in 2024, 79 per cent of UK employers now offer an Employee Assistance Programme. But 85 per cent of those employers report uptake of just 3 to 5 per cent. More than a quarter of employees — 27 per cent — do not know their EAP exists.
PAM Group's Health at Work Report 2025, based on a Sapio Research survey of 1,000 UK workers, found that employee demand for workplace mental health counselling rose from 45 per cent in 2021 to 57 per cent by 2025. Over the same period, access fell from 25 per cent to 22 per cent, and actual uptake declined from 14 per cent to 11 per cent. In other words, more employees want mental health support, fewer are getting it, and the number using what is available is falling.
The PAM Group report also described EAPs as being experienced by many employees as "inaccessible and impersonal." That is not an argument for scrapping EAPs — they remain a valuable tool — but it is a clear indictment of how many are implemented. An EAP buried in an employee handbook, accessible only after a 20-minute phone triage, will not reach employees in distress.
Research by Benenden Health, covering 500 employers and 2,000 employees, found that 75 per cent of UK employers offer workplace mental health support. But only 45 per cent of employees believe mental health is a genuine priority for their employer. Over half are unaware of what support is available to them.
This is not primarily a provision problem. It is a communication, accessibility, and cultural problem. And it matters because employees who receive employer help to stay healthy are, according to PAM Group's data, more than twice as likely to take no sick leave at all — and eight times more likely to report being very or extremely productive.
The message is simple but often lost in practice: investment in mental health benefits only generates a return if employees can find the support, feel safe using it, and trust that doing so will not affect how they are perceived. Building that environment requires more than a subscription to a wellness app.
For HR leaders who still need a compliance argument alongside the commercial one, the legislative context in 2026 has shifted. The Equality Act 2010 and Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 have long required employers to address psychological harm. Guidance from ACAS and the Health and Safety Executive now makes clear that reasonable adjustments for mental health conditions that qualify as disabilities are not discretionary.
The Mental Health Act 2025 — the most comprehensive reform to mental health legislation in over 40 years — has tightened detention criteria and set new expectations around discharge and return-to-work timelines. For HR leaders managing employees returning from mental health-related absences, understanding those obligations is increasingly important. The legal standard is moving in one direction: upward.
CIPD's Health and Wellbeing at Work 2025 report found that just 29 per cent of organisations provide line managers with formal training in mental health. Yet the same data shows that 73 per cent of organisations that do train their managers report those managers feeling confident having sensitive mental health conversations with colleagues.
Research by Benenden Health found that 55 per cent of managers hold back from approaching a struggling employee for fear of saying the wrong thing. That hesitation has real consequences. The manager relationship is consistently cited as one of the most significant factors in employee mental health — more influential, in many cases, than specific benefits provision.
Line manager training is, on most evidence, the single highest-leverage action many organisations can take on mental health. It is also chronically underfunded. If budget decisions are being made ahead of Mental Health Awareness Week, this is where the evidence points.
The architecture of a credible mental health benefits offer has evolved considerably. Employees with access to same-day or next-day GP and mental health consultations — without needing an NHS referral — are considerably better placed than those dependent on overstretched GPs and waiting lists. A GP on Demand service, enabling rapid access to clinical support including mental health referrals, has moved from premium perk to realistic baseline expectation among employees evaluating employers.
An integrated approach brings multiple resources together in one accessible place. A centralised wellbeing hub — bringing together EAP access, digital therapy, financial wellbeing tools, fitness resources, and GP services — removes the friction that causes employees to disengage from support they technically have access to. Visibility, navigation, and trust are the design principles that matter.
The financial wellbeing dimension deserves particular emphasis. Deloitte found that 60 per cent of employees cite the cost of living as a primary concern — and financial stress is one of the most significant drivers of poor mental health in the workforce. Mental health benefits that are disconnected from financial wellbeing support are addressing only part of the equation. This is one reason job satisfaction correlates so strongly with access to holistic, joined-up wellbeing provision.
The Everywhen annual research for 2026 found that 59 per cent of employers are concerned about workforce mental health — a figure that has topped employer wellbeing priorities for five consecutive years, with 49 per cent saying it will remain their primary wellbeing focus over the next 12 months.
The theme of Action for Mental Health Awareness Week 2026 was chosen deliberately. The Mental Health Foundation describes it as a call to turn awareness into meaningful change at three levels: action for yourself, action for someone else, and action for all. For HR and reward professionals, the third level is the relevant one.
Practical actions for HR leaders in the two weeks ahead of MHAW 2026:
Mental Health Awareness Week is well-intentioned but increasingly insufficient as a standalone response. Posting on LinkedIn during the week, then returning to a benefits stack that employees cannot navigate, is not action. In 2026, the bar is higher — and the business case for meeting it is unambiguous.
Employers who want to understand how modern workplace wellbeing platforms bring these elements together should explore what Each Person offers as part of its integrated employee benefits solution.